Posted by on February 3, 2017 11:55 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Business Climate change skepticism and denial Dennis M. Kelleher donald trump Dot-com bubble Economic bubbles Economy Financial crises Financial market Financial Regulation Gambling Gobbledygook Gross Domestic Product headlines John Maynard Keynes Krugman Main Street Market Crash Maynard Keynes Medicare national debt Paul Krugman PrISM stock market Stock market crashes Stock valuation The Apprentice Tricky Dick Trump Administration unemployment Washington D.C.

Submitted by MN Gordon via,

There was, indeed, a time when clear thinking and lucid communication via the written word were held in high regard.  As far as we can tell, this wonderful epoch concluded in 1936.  Everything since has been tortured with varying degrees of gobbledygook.

The fall from grace was triggered by the 1936 publication of John Maynard Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.  The book is rigorously indecipherable.  What’s more, it has the ill-effect of making those who read it dumber.

Nonetheless, politicians and establishment economists remain enamored with Keynes’ gibberish.  For it offers academic rationale for governments to do what they love to do most – borrow money and spend it on inane programs.  In particular, Keynes advocated filling bottles with money and burying them in coalmines for people to dig up as a way to end unemployment.  Somehow, this public works egg hunt would make everyone rich.

Over the years this reasoning has inspired countless government stunts to save the economy from itself.  Not long ago, Keynes devotee, Paul Krugman, took this logic and ran with it to the outer limits of deep space.  In the process, he seems to have lost his mind.

According to Krugman, the proper way to propel an economic growth chart up and to the right is to borrow massive amounts of money and spend it preparing for an alien invasion. Naturally, it takes a Nobel Prize winning economist to come up with such nonsense.

Better Markets

Unfortunately, Keynes’ drivel became the archetypical for illogical economic thought, and still infects economic discourse to this day.  You can hardly browse the headlines of Yahoo finance without your eyeballs being lacerated by it.

Just this week, for instance, we came across a headline titled, The Coming Trump Financial Crash. The author, Dennis M. Kelleher, happens to be President and CEO of the oddly named company Better Markets.  The company website clarifies that Better Markets is “a nonprofit that promotes the public interest in the financial markets.”

What exactly this Washington, D.C. based nonprofit does – or how they keep the lights on – is unclear.  But what is clear is that Kelleher is very comfortable applying words and terms to construct sentences with haphazard syntax.  Kelleher also seems panicked that financial deregulation by Trump is going to cause a great big crash:

“If the Trump administration does just half of what it says it’s going to do in economic policy and financial regulation, another financial crash is almost certain and sooner rather than later.  Worse yet, if they do that, the next crash will be much worse than the last one.

“Why another crash?  Because it appears he is going to cause an asset and stock market bubble at the very same time he is reducing or eliminating the most sensible financial regulation designed to prevent the highest risk gambling on Wall Street.  Tax changes that favor the wealthiest and repatriation of overseas profits that will most likely fund stock buybacks and M&A will be a short-term boost for the stock market.  However, there has been almost no discussion of concrete policies that would actually produce sustainable and durable economic growth in the real economy.

“We have already seen the beginnings of the stock market bubble, with financial stocks leading the way as investors think that Wall Street’s highly profitable, but highest risk activities will create outsized returns […].  If financial regulation designed to protect Main Street’s jobs, homes and savings from Wall Street’s excesses are weakened or eliminated, then those activities will lead to financial excesses and almost certainly end in a financial crash.”

Do you follow the logic?

Don’t Blame Trump When the World Ends

Here at the Economic Prism we think Kelleher is giving President Trump too much credit for what he can and can’t do.  While we agree a stock market crash is in the cards.  Unlike Kelleher, when the crash does inevitably come, we don’t think President Trump is who the fingers of blame should be pointed at.

Regulations, which Kelleher advocates, don’t get at the core of the problem.  Rather, the core of the problem is that today’s fiat money system is completely out of control.  Until something is done about it, we’ll continue to experience epic asset bubbles and busts.

President Trump’s efforts to ease corporate tax policy or financial regulations are small potatoes compared to the destructive market whipsaws that come with rampant credit creation.  Offshore corporate coffers would’ve never been stuffed so full if we had sound money with honest limits.

You may love the man.  You may hate him.  But the fact is, President Trump has been dealt the worst hand of any incoming U.S. President since James Buchanan – or maybe ever.

He’s taking over at a time when the national debt has experienced exponential growth for over 45 years.  The national debt was under $400 billion when Tricky Dick Nixon closed the gold window in 1971.  Today it’s nearly $20 trillion.

In short, the debt curve is entering a hyperbolic state.  No amount of monetary gas will be able to propel it straight up forever.  Of course, when you tack on unfunded liabilities, like social security, prescription drugs, and medicare, the debt runs up to a breathtaking $104.6 trillion.  Each taxpayer’s on the hook for over $874,800.

At the same time, the stock valuations are at nose bleed heights.  The Shiller’s Cyclically Adjusted Price Earnings (CAPE) ratio, for instance, is currently 28.5.  That’s 70 percent higher than the CAPE’s long-term historical average.

In addition, there have only been two occasions over the last 100 years that saw the CAPE at a higher valuation than today.  One was during the late 1920s, right before the stock market crash.  The other was the late 1990s, just prior to the popping of the internet bubble.

Similarly, the Buffett indicator, which is a ratio of the total market capitalization over gross domestic product, also shows that stocks are significantly overvalued.  The ratio currently stands at about 126 percent.  A fairly valued market is a ratio somewhere between 75 and 90 percent.  Anything above 115 percent is considered significantly over valued.

The point is a century of scientific mismanagement of the currency has pushed the economic, financial, and social order well past any rational limit.  Total government debt and stock valuations are at all-time extremes.  Something big is coming.  You can guarantee it.

But don’t blame Trump when the world ends.  There ain’t a doggone thing he or anyone else can do to stop it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *