CalPERS Goes All-In On Pension Accounting Scam; Boosts Stock Allocation To 50%
Posted by Tyler Durden on December 19, 2017 3:36 pm
Tags: Business, California Public Employees' Retirement System, CalPERS, ETC, Finance, Financial markets, fixed, Investment, J. J. Jelincic, League of California Cities, MONEY, Pension fund, Private Equity, Real estate, Social Issues
Categories: Business California Public Employees' Retirement System CalPERS Economy ETC Finance Financial markets fixed Investment J. J. Jelincic League of California Cities money Pension fund Private Equity Real estate Social Issues
Starting July 1, 2018 stock markets around the world are going to get yet another artificial boost courtesy of a decision by the $350 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to allocate another $15 billion in capital to already bubbly equities. Of course, if this decision doesn’t make sense to you that’s because it’s not really meant to make sense.
As Pensions & Investments notes, CalPERS’ decision to hike their equity allocation had absolutely nothing to do with their opinion of relative value between assets classes and nothing to do with traditional valuation metrics that a rational investor might like to see before buying a stake in a business but rather had everything to do with gaming pension accounting rules to make their insolvent fund look a bit better. You see, making the rational decision to lower their exposure to the massive equity bubble could have resulted in CalPERS having to also lower their discount rate for future liabilities…a move which would require more contributions from cities, towns, school districts, etc. and could bring the whole ponzi crashing down.
The new allocation, which goes into effect July 1, 2018, supports CalPERS’ 7% annualized assumed rate of return. The investment committee was considering four options, including one that lowered the rate of return to 6.5% by slashing equity exposure and another that increased it to 7.25% by increasing the exposure to almost 60% of the portfolio.
The lower the rate of rate means more contributions from cities, towns and school districts to CalPERS. Those governmental units are already facing large contribution increases — and have complained loudly at CalPERS meetings — because a decision by the $345.1 billion pension fund’s board in December 2016 to lower the rate of return over three years to 7% from 7.5% by July, 1, 2019.
Meanwhile, there was only one dissenting vote on the decision to hike the fund’s equity exposure. Ironically, the dissent did not come from a rational investor looking to preserve the fund’s assets, but rather from a board member named J.J. Jelincic who wanted to go all-in on the pension accounting scam and hike the fund’s equity allocations to 60% so that discount rates could be raised even higher than the current 7%.
Of course, this is hardly a new topic for us. As we pointed out a year ago in a post entitled “CalPERS Board Votes To Maintain Ponzi Scheme With Only 50bps Reduction Of Discount Rate,” each year CalPERS has to weigh mathematical realities against the risk of disrupting the ponzi scheme and forcing several California cities to the brink of bankruptcy with lower discount rates…‘mathematical realities’ rarely win that fight.
But a CalPERS return reduction would just move the burden to other government units. Groups representing municipal governments in California warn that some cities could be forced to make layoffs and major cuts in city services as well as face the risk of bankruptcy if they have to absorb the decline through higher contributions to CalPERS.
“This is big for us,” Dane Hutchings, a lobbyist with the League of California Cities, said in an interview. “We’ve got cities out there with half their general fund obligated to pension liabilities. How do you run a city with half a budget?”
CalPERS documents show that some governmental units could see their contributions more than double if the rate of return was lowered to 6%. Mr. Hutchings said bankruptcies might occur if cities had a major hike without it being phased in over a period of years. CalPERS’ annual report in September on funding levels and risks also warned of potential bankruptcies by governmental units if the rate of return was decreased.
Under the plan adopted Monday, in addition to their 50% equity allocation, CalPERS will have a 28% weighting to fixed income, up from 20%. Real assets, which includes real estate, will keep its 13% allocation, while private equity will remain at 8% and CalPERS’ liquid portfolio, made up of cash and other short-term instruments, will fall to 1% from 4%.