EU Could Scrap “Divisive & Ineffective” Refugee Quota Scheme
Posted by Tyler Durden on December 13, 2017 7:30 am
Tags: Confederations, Czech, Donald Tusk, europe, European Commission, European Council, European court, European migrant crisis, European Union, George Soros, germany, Greece, Hungary, Iraq, italy, Poland, Politics, President of the European Council, Refugees of the Syrian Civil War, Romania, Slovakia, Social Issues, World history
Categories: Confederations Czech Donald Tusk Economy europe European Commission European Council European court European migrant crisis European Union George Soros germany Greece Hungary Iraq italy Poland Politics President of the European Council Refugees of the Syrian Civil War Romania Slovakia Social Issues World history
The Guardian reports that EU could scrap a divisive scheme that compels member states to accept quotas of refugees, one of the bloc’s most senior leaders will say this week.
The president of the European council, Donald Tusk, will tell EU leaders at a summit on Thursday that mandatory quotas have been divisive and ineffective, in a clear sign that he is ready to abandon the policy that has created bitter splits across the continent.
Jennifer Rankin reports that Tusk will set a six-month deadline for EU leaders to reach unanimous agreement on reforms to the European asylum system, but will propose alternatives if there is no consensus.
“If there is no solution… including on the issue of mandatory quotas, the president of the European council will present a way forward,” states a draft letter from Tusk to national capitals, seen by the Guardian.
In effect this means scrapping mandatory quotas, because Hungary, Poland and Czech Republic are fiercely opposed to the idea of dispersing refugees around the bloc based on a formula drawn up in Brussels. Tusk is likely to face opposition, however, from other EU bodies, including the European commission.
EU leaders introduced compulsory quotas in 2015 at the height of the migration crisis, as thousands of people arrived daily on Europe’s shores, many of whom were refugees from Syria, Iraq and Eritrea.
Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and the Czech Republic voted against the move, but the policy was forced through by a majority vote.
Hungary and Poland have defied the rest of the EU by not taking a single refugee under the scheme, which aimed to relocate about 120,000 refugees, mainly Syrians. The Czech republic has taken in only 12.
All three countries were referred to the European court of justice last week for failing to implement the policy, the usual procedure for flouting EU rules.
Despite the backlash against the emergency scheme, the European commission proposed making quotas a permanent feature of EU law in 2016. Under its proposal, countries that refuse to take part in a “corrective allocation mechanism” to take the pressure off member states bearing the brunt would have to pay a “solidarity contribution” of €250,000 (£220,000) per asylum seeker.
The idea has been stalled for months, as home affairs ministers who make the law have been unable to agree on it.
Tusk will call on EU governments to take charge, rather than leaving Brussels to set the pace in managing refugee policy.
“Only member states are able to tackle the migration crisis effectively,” Tusk’s letter says. “The EU’s role is to offer its full support in all possible ways to help member states handle the migration crisis. But the EU has neither the capacity nor legal possibilities to replace member states.”
Any move to drop the plan is likely to upset Italy and Greece, countries that have urged the rest of the EU to help them cope with large numbers of refugees and migrants in recent years. Germany and Sweden, backed by the European commission, are also likely to contest any plan deemed to reduce the help offered by other member states.
One EU diplomat said some member states were surprised by Tusk’s letter “because it doesn’t seem to be in sync” with work undertaken by home affairs ministers working on the file.
We suspect we know one other ‘European’ that will not be pleased… George Soros.