Could Opposition To 5G (per se) Be Ill-Advised?
Op-Ed by Peter Tocci
From late 2003 to March 2005, I was volunteer webmaster for the Yurko Project. It was an Internet campaign to free from prison a man falsely convicted of Shaken Baby Syndrome. The baby’s symptoms did not arise from shaking, but from the administration to a sick, premature baby of a cocktail of vaccines, the primary offender in which was ‘DTaP’ – Diphtheria, Tetanus, (acellular) Pertussis. I was a practicing massage therapist and wellness consultant at the time.
Quite a large community of medical and health professionals, vaccine activists and lay persons rallied ‘round to lend support, and this put me in touch with websites and activities of the ‘antiVAX’ community. At one point, a vigorous campaign against vaccination arose based on the poisonous preservative used in most vaccines, especially in multi-dose vials, namely Thimerosal, or ethyl mercury.
Being an avid student of the history of medicine and of vaccines especially, I had learned that there were a number of threats vaccination posed, including the mercury, a vicious neurotoxin. I suggested to the anti-vaxxers that opposition to mercury, per se, could backfire, since it was not the only problem, and, depending on one’s perspective, might not have been the worst one. Here’s an example that pertains to the Yurko baby, from neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD (who has also spoken out on Geoengineering/Chemtrails).
The bottom line is that removal of mercury from most vaccines (but not current multi-dose flu vaccines), gave the impression to many that voilà! vaccines were safe. What this effectively did was give activists another hill to climb, namely, the remaining issues, mainly side effects. Had the focus been on vaccines in general, mercury included, the campaign might have had a broader impact.
Before I move on to 5G – and the reader might already be getting the point – I refer to the foundational physiological and philosophical questions about immunity that struck me in the face as I studied basic anatomy and physiology in massage school.
Since I’ve already written about the problem with 5G (per se) opposition in my article on the wireless threat, I’ll just pull an excerpt from it:
…potential flaws exist in the growing opposition to 5G, including Senator Blumenthal’s (D-CT) request to the FCC for proof of safety. This request could amount to mere window dressing if the FCC is allowed to get away with the ruse used to declare 1G-to-4G safe.
Secondly, the safety/health backlash probably should not be aimed at 5G, but at wireless tech per se, 5G included. Otherwise, protesting 5G alone could lend an aura of acceptability to 4G, especially if 5G resistance has effect, and especially with the high level of 4G dependencies, addiction and obsession.
Any objection specific to 5G might better be focused on its potential to ramp up loss of liberty and personal autonomy beyond 4G capability (i.e., in real time), fulfilling a fundamental purpose of wireless per se: A major nail in the coffin of freedom. In other words, oppressive global-fascist governance is more likely to be realized in the technosphere than at the political/governmental level as has been thought. Of course, ‘they’ can control that level too. Nor is Sen. Blumenthal likely, putting it mildly, to touch this fundamental issue.
Wheeler: ‘… America’s local governments will play an important role in determining how we fulfill this national priority.’ …
“So one way of looking at the telecom converted-weapon system is that environmental and health effects are the ‘price’ of a centralized power to monitor, track, data-mine, file, index and dictate/control every aspect of human life – on a global scale (perhaps East and West Elite factions). See George Orwell’s 1984 for the blueprint (minus our rapidly evolving wireless/hi-tech gulag), and China’s social credit system for reflections thereof. China is also the world’s ‘canary’ for manifesting governance by unelected technocrats who want to be your brain/mind and want you to embrace the means of enslavement and control in ‘freedom’s clothing.’
There’s no intent here to dismiss the health effects and amplified threat of 5G, which are discussed in the “Wireless:…” article (transhumanism also). But the point about the 5G per-se opposition is that 4G is more than adequate to achieve planetary destruction—environmental effects of wireless are infinitely more significant than direct effects on humans—as well as the technological global-fascist human-control system (but without real-time response and IOT). Not to mention the Elite’s Illness/Slow-Genocide Agenda. Horrific damage is occurring NOW. A moratorium/ban was desperately needed at least 20 years ago.
Beneath its shiny surface and misleading telecom function, wireless tech per se is a converted military stealth weapon for inducing illness – and a foundational instrument for oppression and loss of personal liberty. So I suggest the opposition be to wireless per se, 5G included, wherein 5G opposition can still flourish.
People Power: Mass marketplace rejection of all wireless systems and devices, while demanding wired systems, seems to be the only way, given Industry/Government awareness of threats at least a decade prior to the original rollout in 1984. Rejection would be a major blow to the Elite Agenda, and the planet might just get a break. If it goes, we go.
Just say No. In this respect, I invoke the slogan of the Addiction Hope and Hotline: “Get clean or die.” Which will you choose, Consumer?
Peter Tocci is a retired massage therapist and wellness consultant with an abiding interest in exploring ‘managed’ history, nefarious covert agendas, and mainstream/mainstream-
© 2019, Peter G Tocci
All Rights Reserved
The article, "Could Opposition To 5G (per se) Be Ill-Advised?", was syndicated from and first appeared at: https://www.activistpost.com/2019/02/could-opposition-to-5g-per-se-be-ill-advised.html.
You may find more great articles by Activist Post on http://www.activistpost.com/.